We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. This includes cookies from third party social media websites if you visit a page which contains embedded content from social media. Such third party cookies may track your use of the Ashburton Investments website. We and our partners also use cookies to ensure we show you advertising that is relevant to you. If you continue to browse our website, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Ashburton Investments website.

Terms and conditions
You are viewing the site as

Change your profile:

You are viewing this site as: Individual investor

Welcome to the Insights preference centre where you can choose which Insights you wish to receive using the checkboxes below:

Your preferences have been updated
Thank you for subscribing.
Focus on...
Richard Robinson Investment Manager

Share this article

<< View all articles

Add Energy to your investments

07 Apr 2017
The cyclical sectors which include consumer cyclicals, basic materials, financial services and energy have a considerable correlation with different phases of the business cycle. The defensive sectors such as consumer staples, communication services, healthcare and utilities do not.

What scares many investors away from the cyclical space is the fear of performance blow-outs when the cycle turns, particularly when invested with a “buy and hold” mentality. Cyclical stocks should never be bought on this basis. Instead you need to identify an active sector strategy that manages the cycle.

The energy sector certainly has one clear driver - the price of oil. It also has a range of sub-sectors that react to the price in very different ways.

This ranges from high sensitivity typically found in the “upstream” sub-sectors closest to the source of oil production including seismic, drilling, service, exploration and production to relatively low sensitivity “downstream” sub-sectors such as shipping, pipeline, refining and major oil companies. 

Taking exposure to a cyclical sector like energy through a passively managed ETF that follows the benchmark is not a suitable option. A portfolio that tracks the benchmark exposes investors to the highest weightings of highly oil price sensitive areas at the top of the cycle, while reducing it at the sector’s lows. Exposure to these “upstream” subsectors hit almost 40% during oil price peaks of 2011 and 2014, while the same subsectors fell to 29% during the energy sector’s lows in 2016. If investors adopted a passive ETF-based approach, they would have been holding low oil price sensitivity at the low points of the cycle and much higher oil price sensitivities at the highs. This is the complete opposite of what is desirable.

Highly cyclical sectors should be managed in a very different way to the management of low cyclical sectors. For this reason, investment managers should place the six to twelve month directional forecast of the oil price at the very core of their methodology. By using subsectors as tools, managers can then either desensitise a portfolio when they believe the oil price is heading lower or increase sensitivity when the oil price is heading higher. The inclusion of such a strategy within an investor’s portfolio allows them to benefit from an actively managed cyclical sector supported by a dedicated and experienced manager.

The energy market is currently entering a very interesting and exciting period. After years of shrinking cash flow and the resulting decimation of capital expenditure on longcycle oil supply projects, which take four to eight years to start production, the market has cleared its excess oil inventories. The energy market is now entering a period when activity has to be extremely strong in order to balance what is increasingly looking like an undersupplied market. We are approaching the time when, the market desperately needs oil with a short lead time.

Short-cycle oil, currently being produced from on-shore US basins with a lead time of approximately six to eight months, can indeed fit that bill.  Thanks to some incredibly strong productivity gains over the last five years, short-cycle oil has moved from being one of the most expensive to one of the cheapest sources of oil (outside of OPEC). Particularly in the offshore space such as the North Sea projects, production is contracting in order to balance the market. The US however, stands to garner much of the market share growth that will be on offer over the next five years. Investors should be looking to the areas that are growing, such as the Permian Basin which has the capacity to increase supply by 10-25% annually over the foreseeable future without creating over supply.

However, even with strong US activity, time looks to be against the industry and the market is looking undersupplied as we enter the close of the decade. Consequently an investor looking to benefit from the value that can be found in the energy sector, should look for a portfolio which is holding high oil price sensitivity in order to maximise their returns during this, the strong part of the cycle.